This Over That
 

What I would like to see is actual numbers of Mana and Experience Points, just like we do in the Hit Points bar....

HP (............................) 234/234
AC 234
ATK 234
MANA (...........................) 234/234
EXPERIENCE (..............................) 234567/345678

This will help us in 2 ways:

1. Given we already know how much mana a spell costs, instead of trying to calculate how many heals you can throw in along with buffs on the current mana pool, we can just take a look and see "Oh....234 mana....I can cast 6 buffs and still have room for 3 heals....ummm....if I don't fizzle...."

2. We'll know EXACTLY where we are xp-wise instead of having to guess how many kills to the next ding. "Instead of attacking that white con which only gives 520 xp per kill, I can level faster by attacking that blue con that gives 680!!!"

Just a thought....
WOOT DING!!!

eq doesn't have a way of doing that, althought there are programs out there (that probably violate the EULA) that can tell you the exact numbers if you want.

You can do that with hp, but not mana and experience, theres an eqtype for the HP though.

Please note the forum the user posted this in "Wish List". Arremis is not asking if it can be done but wishing it could.

It seems they did a change so they now have an EQTYPE 124/125 for Cur and Max MANA and EQTYPE 126/127 for Cur / Max END
Why not add in EQTYPE 128/129 Cur/Max XP and EQTYPE 130/131 Cur/Max AAXP (well not exactly those as I am sure they are taken - but good enough for example sake)

Because a level 75's experience number would look something like this:

47358833843843843488348234

Seriously, it's a MANY digit number. It's been going up exponentially for 75 levels, so it's completely huge now.

Not to be contradictory, but the amount of EXP per kill decreases exponentially. The amount of EXP it takes to level stays the same. I am 99.99% sure that number is 330, but thats from memory, so I'm not 100% sure. I know it's somewhere like that, because my UI does show my Current EXP both as a percent and as a number. I won't post exactly how it's done, because, as previously mentioned, it requires the use of a 3rd party tool. I just wanted to point out that if an EQType was added for it, it would at most by 329/330, which is not that big of a number at all.