EQInterface Forums - View Single Post

I am a noob by most of your standards as I only started playing EQ in February. When I started I have to be honest a warrior was never going to be part of my playing experience. Looking at the changes I may well change my mind. The thought of just bashing things with no real dimension to the character seemed a bit boring. What they are suggesting is adding a new dimension to this type which sounds kinda cool. From my perspective it isn't a button bashing type as a chanter or cleric is but adds a nice twist to an otherwise stand and bash mode of play.
As for a Pally being unwanted I have to say they will always be welcome in groups, even more so if it involves an undead zone and having a pally in a group to be able to pull a mob off of a caster who gets aggro is always a blessing.

just my 2 cents worth but I look forward to seeing how these changes pan out and there may well be a warrior soon in Team Taf

11-25-2003, 07:28 AM	#6
Tafkamb A Treant Join Date: Sep 2003 Server: Venril Sathir Posts: 25	Thoughts I am a noob by most of your standards as I only started playing EQ in February. When I started I have to be honest a warrior was never going to be part of my playing experience. Looking at the changes I may well change my mind. The thought of just bashing things with no real dimension to the character seemed a bit boring. What they are suggesting is adding a new dimension to this type which sounds kinda cool. From my perspective it isn't a button bashing type as a chanter or cleric is but adds a nice twist to an otherwise stand and bash mode of play. As for a Pally being unwanted I have to say they will always be welcome in groups, even more so if it involves an undead zone and having a pally in a group to be able to pull a mob off of a caster who gets aggro is always a blessing. just my 2 cents worth but I look forward to seeing how these changes pan out and there may well be a warrior soon in Team Taf __________________ "If I'm crying, I'm Dying"