Home Forum Downloads My Favorites Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Go Back   EQInterface Forums > Developer Discussion > General authoring help / discussion
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2005, 05:22 PM   #16
Anubuis
A Gray Wolf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Default

CPU speed: 2.2 Ghz
RAM: 1 GB
Operating System: Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 Build 2600
Ticks 1: 10744
Ticks 2: 10715
Ticks 3: 10714
Ticks 4: 10803
Ticks 5: 10717
Ticks per second: 3579545

Last edited by Anubuis : 08-16-2005 at 05:37 PM.
Anubuis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 05:43 PM   #17
Anubuis
A Gray Wolf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Default

That should be about .0029 seconds
__________________
Anubuis
Anubuis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 06:58 PM   #18
Kjan
A Hill Giant
 
Kjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 38
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Send a message via ICQ to Kjan Send a message via AIM to Kjan
Default

Looking forward to this being released, many times I've dreamt of editing the interface to suit my wants and needs but without the knowledge of XML it is impossible.

Hopfully with this us XML n00bs can create some good UI's

CPU speed: Intel 1.80Ghz
RAM: 256MB
Operating System: Windows XP SP2 Build 2600
Ticks 1:35165
Ticks 2:34986
Ticks 3:38020
Ticks 4:44915
Ticks 5:36329
Ticks per second:3579545
__________________
Sir Kjan Alodedar - Level 70 Paladin of Tunare

Last edited by Kjan : 08-17-2005 at 10:46 AM.
Kjan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 08:49 PM   #19
woohoo37573
A Bat
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Default

CPU speed: 1.8 Ghz
RAM: 1 GB
Operating System: Windows XP Home Service Pack 2 Build 2600
Ticks 1: 14359
Ticks 2: 14260
Ticks 3: 15433
Ticks 4: 14532
Ticks 5: 15332
Ticks per second: 3579545

average: .0041 seconds

friends computer not my actual computer
woohoo37573 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 10:12 PM   #20
GreenDragon
An Icepaw Kobold
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Server: Vazaelle
Posts: 89
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

A friend computer

CPU speed: 1.8 Ghz
RAM: 512 MB
Operating System: Windows XP Home Service Pack 2 Build 2600
Ticks 1: 14709
Ticks 2: 14906
Ticks 3: 14499
Ticks 4: 14652
Ticks 5: 14542
Ticks per second: 3579545

The average is .0040 seconds.
GreenDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 11:41 PM   #21
danny91643
A Lost Soul
 
danny91643's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Server: Zek
Posts: 420
Default

CPU speed: 1.8 Ghz
RAM: 512 MB
Operating System:Windows XP Pro SP2 Build 2600
Ticks 1:14360
Ticks 2:14270
Ticks 3:15420
Ticks 4:14540
Ticks 5:15350
Ticks per second:3579545
__________________
danny91643 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 02:55 AM   #22
GreenDragon
An Icepaw Kobold
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Server: Vazaelle
Posts: 89
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

Thats an average of .0041 seconds. So far the average is around .004 seconds on a 1.9 GHz processor. Thanks for all the score posting. I will not need any more for right now, but please keep posting suggestions and scores if you would like if you happen to have less ram or a slower process or even an older OS please post your scores so I know how it fares on your system.
GreenDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2005, 10:17 PM   #23
Kjan
A Hill Giant
 
Kjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 38
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Send a message via ICQ to Kjan Send a message via AIM to Kjan
Default

From my main PC used for EQ

CPU Speed: Athlon FX-55 (2.61Ghz)
RAM: 1GB
Operating System: Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Build 2600

Ticks 1:9390
Ticks 2:9290
Ticks 3:9219
Ticks 4:9350
Ticks 5:9532
Ticks per second: 3579545
Kjan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2005, 08:33 PM   #24
GreenDragon
An Icepaw Kobold
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Server: Vazaelle
Posts: 89
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

Wow a 64bit processor was fast .0026 seconds.
GreenDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2005, 08:52 PM   #25
Drumstix42
A Snow Griffin
 
Drumstix42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Server:
Posts: 50
Send a message via AIM to Drumstix42 Send a message via Yahoo to Drumstix42
Default

CPU speed: 2.2ghz
RAM: 2GB
Operating System:Windows SP2
Ticks 1: 11137
Ticks 2: 11136
Ticks 3: 11379
Ticks 4: 11218
Ticks 5: 11045
Ticks per second: 3579545

(Using a 64bit processor)
Drumstix42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2005, 06:50 PM   #26
bishop4351
A Bat
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1
Default

CPU speed: Dual Xeon 2.0Ghz
RAM: 2 Gig
Operating System: Windows Xp SP2
Ticks 1: 15389540
Ticks 2: 15110528
Ticks 3: 15352968
Ticks 4: 19267124
Ticks 5: 19143872
Ticks per second: 1993390000
bishop4351 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2005, 11:13 PM   #27
GreenDragon
An Icepaw Kobold
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Server: Vazaelle
Posts: 89
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

Drumstix you average was .0031 seconds.

Bishop your average was about .0084 seconds.

Both very impressive thanks for posting these uncomming computer configurations. The third and final version of the file reading function is almost done. After its finished I can procced with the rest of the program. Keep checking back I should have it ready for testing tomorow evening.
GreenDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005, 12:56 AM   #28
axeion
A Predatory Creeper
 
axeion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Server: bristlebane
Posts: 254
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

will this need net 1.0 or will newer versions of net work with it? ran into a problem with old sidlwidl an net 1.0 .usen norton ghost 9.0 one must use 1.1 net or better./bleh

sign me up as a tester.an thank you for your time an effort on this.

CPU speed:AMD Athlon xp 2500 1.84Ghz
RAM:2.00 GB
Operating System:xp home editon service pack 2
Ticks 1:38262
Ticks 2:23318
Ticks 3:21811
Ticks 4:23270
Ticks 5:22262
Ticks per second:3579545

if i did this right average is .0072 this is a new system still breaking it in.
__________________

"A man has honor if he holds himself to an ideal of conduct though it is inconvenient, unprofitable, or dangerous to do so. "
Walter Lippmann

Last edited by axeion : 08-23-2005 at 01:24 AM.
axeion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005, 11:12 PM   #29
GreenDragon
An Icepaw Kobold
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Server: Vazaelle
Posts: 89
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

Yea you did the average right. Sorry guys I haven't worked on it since I last posted because college just started and the financial aid people are just being dumb. Now back to the program. It is taking me a bit longer to write due to the fact i'm writing in c++ and not using .net at all. This means many things. Mostly pro though. For one it will run faster, it will be easier to optimize, and more portable with the different windows emulators. The cons though are slower devolpment time. Expect good news shortly.
GreenDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2005, 10:51 PM   #30
GreenDragon
An Icepaw Kobold
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Server: Vazaelle
Posts: 89
Interface Author - Click to view interfaces
Default

.Net for one is extremely slow because of all the overhead. It will be easier to port because .net isnt yet fully made on each system. Also the whole latin comment is so freaking funny because I can speak latin. Overall .net sucks because if you knew the problems of the other program then you would agree.
GreenDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© MMOUI